By: Matthew Wedzerai . Published: 19-03-2022

The impacts of African Swine Fever have frequently been described quantitatively, though it is increasingly acknowledged that these impacts extend well beyond numbers.

A multidisciplinary team of researchers applied participatory tools (focus group discussions, informant interviews, and network mapping activities) to gather data to determine the socio-economic and livelihood impact of African Swine Fever (ASF) in small-scale pig farming communities and value chains in the Philippines. Their findings were published in the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science. According to the researchers, the significant emotional attachment of Filipino farmers to their pigs is underreported and has not been part of the discussion on ASF in the Philippines.

Vulnerability to livelihood stressors

The researchers found that communities differed in their underlying vulnerability to livelihood stressors associated with ASF. The results of this study demonstrated that communities with underlying vulnerabilities such as seasonal changes in income, livestock diseases, and natural disasters can be impacted heavily by ASF. In addition to seasonal vulnerabilities, biosecurity remains a major challenge for smallholder farming systems globally, rendering them more vulnerable to infectious diseases than large-scale production systems with higher biosecurity standards.

Also contributing to vulnerability context, farmers faced additional, ongoing challenges in pig production including high feed prices, no or limited informal credits provided by input suppliers, low live weight prices from traders, and high vaccine prices. “A rapid situation analysis such as the one conducted in this study to capture and contextualize ASF impacts within the broader vulnerability context could be used to tailor support according to need,” said the research team.

Impact on communication

Relationships between animal health workers and farmers were important for communicating ASF risk mitigation information. The relationships were, however, put under significant strain during depopulation campaigns following ASF outbreaks. The social inclusion mapping for the participants became an eye-opener for them to unite for one common goal of helping one another and for their sector to survive, for example, establishing volunteer pig farmers who are responsible for information dissemination and surveillance in their community.

Through the focus groups, the researchers found the need for organized pig farmers’ associations or cooperatives through which farmers could easily access discounted inputs and have a voice in crafting political policy in their sector that the local government units will pass. Researchers think improved communication and trust-building with the affected communities will not only improve safety for workers but also increase the effectiveness of control programmes.

Financial capital

All farmers in this study, from small and larger properties, experienced financial losses from the ASF epidemic. As a result of ASF, most smallholder pig farms’ incomes were negatively affected and they struggled to repay loans, and because of biosecurity requirements, most backyard farms closed. This pilot data also revealed that most actors in the value chain suffered significant losses because of ASF, although some pig traders even benefited from ASF in the short term by taking advantage of panic selling of healthy pigs.

As explained by an input supplier in this study, when the millions of smallholders go out of business, the loss of their collective contribution means enormous losses for many associated value chain actors. As the sector becomes dominated by large-scale production there will be a concentration of value chain actors, potentially putting many thousands of small-scale input suppliers, buyers, traders, butchers, and meat sellers out of business. Most farmers expressed their desire for the government to consider focusing support on backyard pig farmers to get them back into pig raising.

Psychosocial impacts

The researchers found significant psychosocial impacts of ASF on pig farmers. Findings from focus groups and interviews revealed the deep, emotional impacts of ASF and associated control measures. Open discussions with farmers revealed the intangible significance of pigs in their lives: “Pigs are like our children. We would often talk with them and would even cry when they are being sold. Even our children see the pigs as part of the family,” said one of the participants. The researchers described the tears of participants as they talked about the toll of ASF; they frequently spoke of the trauma of watching or hearing their pigs being shot under the depopulation effort. More info at: