I have been in general practice seeing first opinion cases in the community for 35 years. Until a very few years ago, I had never seen a dog with cropped ears with the exception of photographs or foreign films.
Ear cropping is when the ear lobes of a dog are cut off in part or whole, usually without any anesthesia or pain relief, for purely cosmetic reasons. The procedure usually takes place when puppies are two or three months old, and the trauma of the procedure can have a significant psychological impact on the maturing dog.
It was well known to be an illegal mutilation in the UK, and till recently, the importation of dogs with cropped ears was pretty rare and limited largely to repatriations.
Maybe three or four years ago, I began to see the odd dog with cropped ears that originated overseas. I usually expressed surprise and some disapproval, but it clearly wasn’t a prime motivator for the owner in acquiring that animal. The significance of the procedure was usually poorly understood, and it was simply something that had happened before the pet was acquired.
Suddenly everything changed.
Importation of pets became commonplace, a combination of the popularity of rescuing stray and distressed animals and the availability of puppies abroad to meet a national demand that outstripped availability or the desire for instant gratification.
It also seems that in the arms race that is fashion, dogs have moved from being something you might acquire with a certain appearance to make a statement about yourself, to something you might surgically disfigure to enhance your image and status within a peer group.
n a very short period of time, my practice began to see young animals with cropped ears. Their owners usually said they had acquired the dogs abroad, but significantly we suspect they had done so purely to circumvent the law that prevents ear cropping at home.
More alarmingly, microchip information has confirmed to us that at least one puppy we have seen was cropped in the UK as it was chipped here at eight weeks old and had been cropped when presented for first vaccination.
It is clear to me that anyone performing this illegal and completely pointless painful procedure, quite likely without the benefits of appropriate anesthesia or pain relief, would tell an owner to claim that the animal was sourced legally abroad. We have had a number of examples of this, but the most superficial questioning usually illustrates that either that was not the case or at best it was an illegal importation, either smuggled or abusing the pet travel scheme.